How we calculate your AI footprint
A plain-English summary of the numbers on your dashboard, where they come from, and the honest limitations we think you should know about.
The short version
For every message in your export, we look up a published estimate of how much energy, water, and CO₂ a single message of that model type costs. Then we add them all up and scale CO₂ to your local electricity grid. That’s it — no machine learning, no token counting, no calls back to OpenAI or Anthropic. Pure arithmetic over a small table of numbers.
The per-message estimates
Each message is assigned a “cost” based on which model answered it:
| Model | Energy (Wh) | Water (mL) | CO₂ (g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| GPT-4o / default | 0.3 | 1.11 | 0.13 |
| GPT-4o mini / GPT-3.5 | 0.15 | 0.56 | 0.07 |
| GPT-4 / GPT-4 Turbo | 2.9 | 10.73 | 1.3 |
| o1 / o1-preview (reasoning) | 15.0 | 55.5 | 6.5 |
| o1-mini (reasoning) | 5.0 | 18.5 | 2.2 |
| Claude (default) | 0.3 | 1.11 | 0.13 |
- Energy — from Epoch AI’s 2025 analysis (“How much energy does ChatGPT use?”), which put GPT-4o at ~0.3 Wh per query. Cross-checked against Sam Altman’s July 2025 figure of 0.34 Wh.
- Water — calculated as energy × 3.7 mL/Wh, using the Scope 1 + 2 method from Ren et al.’s peer-reviewed paper “Making AI Less Thirsty” (CACM 2025). This counts both on-site datacenter cooling and water consumed at the power plants that supply the electricity — the same accounting convention we use for CO₂.
- CO₂ — derived from the energy figure at a world-average grid carbon intensity, then multiplied by a regional factor (see below).
- Reasoning models (o1, o1-preview, o1-mini) — extrapolated at roughly 30–50× the GPT-4o cost, consistent with Jegham et al. (2025), who measured reasoning models at ~30× non-reasoning energy on long prompts.
Your local electricity grid matters for CO₂
Because generating electricity produces very different amounts of CO₂ depending on the energy mix, we multiply the raw CO₂ total by a regional factor derived from IEA grid data:
- US — ×0.95
- UK / Europe — ×0.44
- India — ×1.77
- Australia — ×1.38
- Other / unknown — ×1.0
So a UK user’s CO₂ number is less than half a US user’s, for the same number of queries. Energy and water are not region-adjusted — those numbers represent the actual resource use, not the emissions profile.
The everyday comparisons
To make the numbers less abstract, we convert them to familiar things:
- Bottles of water — 500 mL per bottle. Used when your total is ≥ 4 L.
- Glasses of water — 250 mL per glass. Used below 4 L.
- Phone charges — 10 Wh (0.01 kWh) per charge of a typical smartphone battery.
- Hours of Netflix — 77 Wh (0.077 kWh) per hour of HD streaming (IEA 2020 estimate). Shown when your energy is below one phone charge.
- Miles driven — 404 g CO₂ per mile. This is the US EPA average for a gasoline passenger vehicle (~22 MPG), from the EPA’s “Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle” factsheet.
- % of a daily footprint — 44 kg CO₂ per day is the average American’s total daily footprint across everything (commute, food, home energy). So 440 g would be 1% of a typical day.
What we don’t count (and why your number is still an estimate)
- Training energy. We count only the cost of running your queries. The energy cost of training GPT-4o or Claude is amortised across billions of users and excluded here — include it and the numbers roughly double.
- Message length. Every message is priced the same, whether it’s “hi” or a 3,000-word analysis. A token-weighted model would be more accurate but isn’t feasible with the export data we get.
- Image generation, voice, tools, browsing. These are typically more expensive than text but aren’t separable in the export.
- ChatGPT model detection. OpenAI’s new export format no longer includes the model slug per message. For those uploads, every message resolves to the GPT-4o default — even if you actually used GPT-4, o1, or o1-mini for some of them. Your reasoning-model usage, specifically, is almost certainly under-counted.
- Claude model detection. Claude exports include no model information at all — not even a blank field. Claude usage is all billed at the GPT-4o baseline. Sonnet, Opus, and Haiku all look identical to us. Opus is probably larger than GPT-4o, so heavy Opus users are likely under-counted too.
Sources
- Epoch AI (2025). How much energy does ChatGPT use?
- Ren, S. et al. (2023 / CACM 2025). Making AI Less Thirsty — peer-reviewed Scope 1+2 water methodology.
- Jegham, A. et al. (2025). How Hungry is AI? — empirical energy measurements including reasoning models.
- Altman, S. (2025). The Gentle Singularity — OpenAI’s own per-query figures.
- IEA (2024). Energy and AI — regional grid carbon intensity.
- US EPA. Greenhouse Gas Emissions from a Typical Passenger Vehicle — 404 g CO₂/mile figure.
Last updated April 2026. Got a question or a better source? Email us.